Kuroma Kuroma

merit-times.com 的 AI Readiness 實測 50/100

人間福報 (merit-times.com) 的 AI Readiness 實測為 50/100（B 級），檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 14 日。 表現最強的是技術（76 分），最弱的是AI 就緒度（24 分）；最大的單一缺口是答案框潛力，0/100（No passage an assistant could quote whole）。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 30,898 個網站 中，這個分數排在前四分之一。

檢測網址: https://merit-times.com

50/100
等級
B

能挽回最多分數的檢查項目是值得被引用度：這項占總分 7.5%，只拿到 0/100，讓總分少了 7.5 分。

這次檢測距今已 32 天。AI 的回答會隨時間改變，現在 AI 搜尋看到的情況可能和這張成績單不同。

32 天前更新

在所有受測網站中排前 25% 中位數 39 · 前四分之一門檻 45 · 樣本為 30,898 個受測網站

merit-times.com 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎？

大致可以，仍有缺口：merit-times.com 的實測分數為 50/100（B 級）。 要補的缺口是 Make This Page’s Facts Extractable、Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers。

類別分數

頁面內容 占總分 25% 57
技術 占總分 20% 76
權威性 占總分 25% 52
AI 就緒度 占總分 30% 24

優先修正項目（依可挽回的分數排序）

排序依據是各項檢查的占分乘以落差，因此排最前面的是收益最大的修正，不一定是分數最低的檢查。

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content 最多可 +7.5 分

    位於 https://merit-times.com · AI 就緒度 → 值得被引用度, 得分 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers 最多可 +7.2 分

    位於 https://merit-times.com · AI 就緒度 → 答案框潛力, 得分 0/100

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
    • Add a section heading followed by 25 to 200 words that answer it on their own, so an assistant can lift the answer without the rest of the page
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
  3. Add External Citations & References 最多可 +5.9 分

    位於 https://merit-times.com · 權威性 → 外部引用與參考來源, 得分 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  4. Improve Unique Value Proposition 最多可 +5.1 分

    位於 https://merit-times.com · AI 就緒度 → 獨特價值主張, 得分 0/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable 最多可 +3.9 分

    位於 https://merit-times.com · 頁面內容 → 結構化資料品質, 得分 13/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page

全部 19 項評分檢查

公開評分標準的每一項檢查，以及本次檢測在頁面上實際看到的內容。

頁面內容 占總分 25%

  • 內容深度與完整性 通過 84/100

    占總分 6.5%

    Found: 1539 words, 16 paragraphs, 6 lists, 78 images (61 with alt text)

    • 17 images missing alt text (e.g. ../img/icon/user.svg, ../img/icon/btn-list_before.svg, ../img/icon/btn-list_after.svg)
  • 問題涵蓋度與 FAQ 存在與否 部分符合 73/100

    占總分 6.5%

    No FAQ structure. 11 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • 結構化資料品質 未通過 13/100

    占總分 4.5%

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, NewsMediaOrganization, Organization

  • AI 可讀性分數 部分符合 50/100

    占總分 3%

    Average 9 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.

    • No block of writing on this page reads as a paragraph, so paragraph length could not be judged
  • 標題階層 待改善 42/100

    占總分 2.8%

    H1: 0, H2: 11, H3: 45. Hierarchy issues.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • 媒體無障礙性 待改善 44/100

    占總分 1.8%

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 17 of 78 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 11 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("人間福報", "人間福報", "人間雲").
    • 50 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 78 images but only ~1539 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

技術 占總分 20%

  • Schema 標記完整性 通過 100/100

    占總分 1%

    3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • 頁面效能指標 待改善 34/100

    占總分 2%

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (3905ms). 17 render-blocking resources. 1822 elements for 1539 words

    • Server response was slow (3905ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
    • 17 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • 行動裝置優化 通過 85/100

    占總分 4%

    Has viewport. 56 responsive images

  • 可爬取性與可存取性 通過 78/100

    占總分 13%

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 28 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 28 of 389 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended, Meta-ExternalAgent, Amazonbot, CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not …
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing

權威性 占總分 25%

  • E-E-A-T 訊號 部分符合 57/100

    占總分 7%

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 14/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 10/25. Has author

  • 外部引用與參考來源 待改善 35/100

    占總分 9%

    26 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • 信任與品牌訊號 部分符合 64/100

    占總分 9%

    Present: Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (4)

    • No about or company page linked from this page

AI 就緒度 占總分 30%

  • 答案框潛力 未通過 0/100

    占總分 7.2%

    0 of 56 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
  • 值得被引用度 未通過 0/100

    占總分 7.5%

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • 內容新鮮度 通過 79/100

    占總分 5.7%

    References current year. Last modified: 8/14/2026

  • 獨特價值主張 未通過 0/100

    占總分 5.1%

    0 of 110 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI 可發現性 未檢測 81/100

    占總分 3%

    Score: 81/100

  • 原始 HTML 可用性 未通過 10/100

    占總分 1.5%

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

本次檢測衡量的是引用就緒度：AI 引擎能多容易地爬取、擷取並引述這些頁面。它無法看見站外品牌足跡（提及、評論、第三方報導），而這些足跡決定了 AI 引擎是否會檢索某個品牌；Kuroma 的能見度掃描與站外訊號負責追蹤那一面。 評分方式說明

檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單