Kuroma Kuroma

choukai.me 的 AI Readiness 實測 24/100

卓昱凱(Toh Io̍k Khái) (choukai.me) 的 AI Readiness 實測為 24/100（F 級），檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 16 日。 表現最強的是技術（44 分），最弱的是AI 就緒度（8 分）；最大的單一缺口是結構化資料品質，0/100（No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose）。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 30,898 個網站 中，這個分數低於中位數。

檢測網址: https://choukai.me

24/100
等級
F

能挽回最多分數的檢查項目是可爬取性與可存取性：這項占總分 13%，只拿到 34/100，讓總分少了 8.6 分。

這次檢測距今已 29 天。AI 的回答會隨時間改變，現在 AI 搜尋看到的情況可能和這張成績單不同。

29 天前更新

在所有受測網站中低於中位數 中位數 39 · 前四分之一門檻 45 · 樣本為 30,898 個受測網站

choukai.me 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎？

還沒有：choukai.me 的實測分數為 24/100（F 級）。 先從這裡開始： Make This Page’s Facts Extractable、Add FAQ Schema Markup。

類別分數

頁面內容 占總分 25% 28
技術 占總分 20% 44
權威性 占總分 25% 25
AI 就緒度 占總分 30% 8

優先修正項目（依可挽回的分數排序）

排序依據是各項檢查的占分乘以落差，因此排最前面的是收益最大的修正，不一定是分數最低的檢查。

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access 最多可 +8.6 分

    位於 https://choukai.me · 技術 → 可爬取性與可存取性, 得分 34/100

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 16 of 43 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended, Meta-ExternalAgent, Amazonbot, CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not …
    • Add canonical tag to prevent duplicate content issues
    • Add lang attribute to HTML element
    • This page opens 13 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content 最多可 +7.5 分

    位於 https://choukai.me · AI 就緒度 → 值得被引用度, 得分 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals 最多可 +7 分

    位於 https://choukai.me · 權威性 → E-E-A-T 訊號, 得分 0/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  4. Add Trust Signals 最多可 +6.6 分

    位於 https://choukai.me · 權威性 → 信任與品牌訊號, 得分 27/100

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)
  5. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers 最多可 +6.6 分

    位於 https://choukai.me · AI 就緒度 → 答案框潛力, 得分 9/100

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
    • Add a section heading followed by 25 to 200 words that answer it on their own, so an assistant can lift the answer without the rest of the page
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses

全部 19 項評分檢查

公開評分標準的每一項檢查，以及本次檢測在頁面上實際看到的內容。

頁面內容 占總分 25%

  • 內容深度與完整性 部分符合 65/100

    占總分 6.5%

    Found: 2203 words, 25 paragraphs, 53 images (0 with alt text)

    • Limited use of lists for scannable content
    • 53 images missing alt text (e.g. ../images/tbpic01.png, /images/tzubun.png, /images/tbmb.png)
  • 問題涵蓋度與 FAQ 存在與否 未通過 7/100

    占總分 6.5%

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • 結構化資料品質 未通過 0/100

    占總分 4.5%

    No JSON-LD structured data found

    • No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
  • AI 可讀性分數 部分符合 69/100

    占總分 3%

    Average 9 words/sentence. 14 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • 標題階層 未通過 0/100

    占總分 2.8%

    H1: 0, H2: 0, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • No headings a reader can see
  • 媒體無障礙性 未通過 10/100

    占總分 1.8%

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 53 of 53 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 53 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 53 images but only ~2203 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

技術 占總分 20%

  • Schema 標記完整性 待改善 40/100

    占總分 1%

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • 頁面效能指標 通過 78/100

    占總分 2%

    7 render-blocking resources. 759 elements for 2203 words

  • 行動裝置優化 部分符合 60/100

    占總分 4%

    Has viewport

  • 可爬取性與可存取性 待改善 34/100

    占總分 13%

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 16 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 16 of 43 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended, Meta-ExternalAgent, Amazonbot, CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not …

權威性 占總分 25%

  • E-E-A-T 訊號 未通過 0/100

    占總分 7%

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • 外部引用與參考來源 待改善 43/100

    占總分 9%

    12 external links, 0 citation phrases, 1 statistics. No references section.

  • 信任與品牌訊號 待改善 27/100

    占總分 9%

    Present: About page, Social profiles (3)

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI 就緒度 占總分 30%

  • 答案框潛力 未通過 9/100

    占總分 7.2%

    0 of 0 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
  • 值得被引用度 未通過 0/100

    占總分 7.5%

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • 內容新鮮度 未通過 5/100

    占總分 5.7%

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • 獨特價值主張 未通過 12/100

    占總分 5.1%

    1 of 187 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI 可發現性 未檢測 27/100

    占總分 3%

    Score: 27/100

  • 原始 HTML 可用性 未通過 10/100

    占總分 1.5%

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

本次檢測衡量的是引用就緒度：AI 引擎能多容易地爬取、擷取並引述這些頁面。它無法看見站外品牌足跡（提及、評論、第三方報導），而這些足跡決定了 AI 引擎是否會檢索某個品牌；Kuroma 的能見度掃描與站外訊號負責追蹤那一面。 評分方式說明

檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單