ladylike.com.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 49/100
ladylike.com.tw 是 Medical Spa 類網站;Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 49/100(C 級),檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 20 日。 表現最強的是技術(81 分),最弱的是AI 就緒度(32 分);最大的單一缺口是結構化資料品質,0/100(No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 11 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar)。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 30,898 個網站 中,這個分數排在前四分之一。
檢測網址: https://ladylike.com.tw
能挽回最多分數的檢查項目是值得被引用度:這項占總分 7.5%,只拿到 0/100,讓總分少了 7.5 分。
這次檢測距今已 26 天。AI 的回答會隨時間改變,現在 AI 搜尋看到的情況可能和這張成績單不同。
在所有受測網站中排前 25% 中位數 39 · 前四分之一門檻 45 · 樣本為 30,898 個受測網站
ladylike.com.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎?
部分準備好:ladylike.com.tw 的實測分數為 49/100(C 級)。 最該先做的兩件事是 Make This Page’s Facts Extractable、Increase Citation-Worthy Content。
類別分數
優先修正項目(依可挽回的分數排序)
排序依據是各項檢查的占分乘以落差,因此排最前面的是收益最大的修正,不一定是分數最低的檢查。
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content 最多可 +7.5 分
位於 https://ladylike.com.tw · AI 就緒度 → 值得被引用度, 得分 0/100
- Limited use of specific statistics
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals 最多可 +6.1 分
位於 https://ladylike.com.tw · 權威性 → E-E-A-T 訊號, 得分 13/100
- No author attribution found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Add External Citations & References 最多可 +5.9 分
位於 https://ladylike.com.tw · 權威性 → 外部引用與參考來源, 得分 35/100
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Add a references or sources section
- Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
-
Improve Unique Value Proposition 最多可 +4.8 分
位於 https://ladylike.com.tw · AI 就緒度 → 獨特價值主張, 得分 5/100
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
- Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
- Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
- Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
-
Add Trust Signals 最多可 +4.7 分
位於 https://ladylike.com.tw · 權威性 → 信任與品牌訊號, 得分 48/100
- No contact information easily accessible
- Your Organization schema declares 3 of the identity properties engines read; add the rest (name, url, logo, sameAs, contactPoint, address)
- Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)
- Add customer testimonials or reviews
全部 19 項評分檢查
公開評分標準的每一項檢查,以及本次檢測在頁面上實際看到的內容。
頁面內容 占總分 25%
-
占總分 6.5%
Found: 1006 words, 17 paragraphs, 11 lists, 31 images (24 with alt text)
- 7 images missing alt text
-
占總分 6.5%
No FAQ structure. 5 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
-
占總分 4.5%
1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: ProfessionalService, Organization, WebSite, ImageObject, WebPage, Person, Article
- No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 11 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
-
占總分 3%
Average 11 words/sentence. 7 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
占總分 2.8%
H1: 1, H2: 5, H3: 9. Proper hierarchy.
-
占總分 1.8%
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 7 of 31 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 29 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- This page has 31 images but only ~1006 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
技術 占總分 20%
-
占總分 1%
1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
占總分 2%
Fetch succeeded but was slow (3171ms). 52 render-blocking resources. 1020 elements for 1006 words
- Server response was slow (3171ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
- 52 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
-
占總分 4%
Has viewport. 18 responsive images
-
占總分 13%
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 12 placeholder links
- 12 of 123 links cannot be followed by a crawler
權威性 占總分 25%
-
占總分 7%
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 10/25
- No author attribution found
-
占總分 9%
16 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.
-
占總分 9%
Present: About page, Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Social profiles (2)
- No contact information easily accessible
AI 就緒度 占總分 30%
-
占總分 7.2%
4 of 15 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures
- No FAQ structure detected
-
占總分 7.5%
0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
占總分 5.7%
No recent year references. Last modified: 5/6/2026
- No recent year references in content
-
占總分 5.1%
0 of 56 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
-
占總分 3%
Score: 60/100
-
占總分 1.5%
1006 words readable without JavaScript
本次檢測衡量的是引用就緒度:AI 引擎能多容易地爬取、擷取並引述這些頁面。它無法看見站外品牌足跡(提及、評論、第三方報導),而這些足跡決定了 AI 引擎是否會檢索某個品牌;Kuroma 的能見度掃描與站外訊號負責追蹤那一面。 評分方式說明
檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站?認領這張成績單其他還沒有公開成績單的 Medical Spa 類網站
這些網站目前還沒有公開的 AI Readiness 成績單。選一個就能免費檢測;要在下一頁按下確認才會開始。