mx-digi.com 的 AI Readiness 實測 31/100
MX 創意思境 (mx-digi.com) 的 AI Readiness 實測為 31/100(F 級),檢測日期 2026 年 9 月 22 日。 表現最強的是技術(65 分),最弱的是AI 就緒度(21 分);最大的單一缺口是問題涵蓋度與 FAQ 存在與否,0/100(No FAQ schema markup detected)。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 30,995 個網站 中,這個分數低於中位數。
檢測網址: https://mx-digi.com
能挽回最多分數的檢查項目是外部引用與參考來源:這項占總分 9%,只拿到 15/100,讓總分少了 7.7 分。
這次檢測距今已 15 天。AI 的回答會隨時間改變,現在 AI 搜尋看到的情況可能和這張成績單不同。
在所有受測網站中低於中位數 中位數 39 · 前四分之一門檻 45 · 樣本為 30,995 個受測網站
mx-digi.com 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎?
還沒有:mx-digi.com 的實測分數為 31/100(F 級)。 先從這裡開始: Add FAQ Schema Markup、Make This Page’s Facts Extractable。
類別分數
優先修正項目(依可挽回的分數排序)
排序依據是各項檢查的占分乘以落差,因此排最前面的是收益最大的修正,不一定是分數最低的檢查。
-
Add External Citations & References 最多可 +7.7 分
位於 https://mx-digi.com · 權威性 → 外部引用與參考來源, 得分 15/100
- Few external citations to authoritative sources
- Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Add a references or sources section
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content 最多可 +7.5 分
位於 https://mx-digi.com · AI 就緒度 → 值得被引用度, 得分 0/100
- Limited use of specific statistics
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Add FAQ Schema Markup 最多可 +6.5 分
位於 https://mx-digi.com · 頁面內容 → 問題涵蓋度與 FAQ 存在與否, 得分 0/100
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
- Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
- Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
- Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals 最多可 +6.1 分
位於 https://mx-digi.com · 權威性 → E-E-A-T 訊號, 得分 13/100
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Update Content Freshness 最多可 +5.7 分
位於 https://mx-digi.com · AI 就緒度 → 內容新鮮度, 得分 0/100
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
- Update statistics and data to 2026
- Add article:modified_time meta tag
- Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
全部 19 項評分檢查
公開評分標準的每一項檢查,以及本次檢測在頁面上實際看到的內容。
頁面內容 占總分 25%
-
占總分 6.5%
Found: 98 words, 1 paragraphs, 51 images (24 with alt text)
- Content length (98 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
- Limited use of lists for scannable content
- 27 images missing alt text (e.g. …
-
占總分 6.5%
No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
占總分 4.5%
2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: BreadcrumbList, WebSite, ProfessionalService, WebPage, Service
- No extractable data structures found — the page is unbroken prose
-
占總分 3%
Average 5 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
占總分 2.8%
H1: 1, H2: 0, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.
- Insufficient section headings to break the content up
-
占總分 1.8%
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 27 of 51 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 5 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("77 官網", "SUZUKI官網", "台電綠網").
- 48 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- This page has 51 images but only ~98 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
技術 占總分 20%
-
占總分 1%
2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
占總分 2%
23 render-blocking resources. 379 elements for 98 words
- 23 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
-
占總分 4%
Has viewport
-
占總分 13%
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 4 placeholder links
- 4 of 34 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).
權威性 占總分 25%
-
占總分 7%
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 0/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
占總分 9%
2 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.
- Few external citations to authoritative sources
-
占總分 9%
Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (2)
AI 就緒度 占總分 30%
-
占總分 7.2%
1 of 1 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures
- No FAQ structure detected
-
占總分 7.5%
0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
占總分 5.7%
No recent year references
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
占總分 5.1%
0 of 11 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
-
占總分 3%
Score: 51/100
-
占總分 1.5%
98 words readable without JavaScript
- Only 98 words are readable without JavaScript; AI crawlers run no JavaScript and will see very little of this page.
本次檢測衡量的是引用就緒度:AI 引擎能多容易地爬取、擷取並引述這些頁面。它無法看見站外品牌足跡(提及、評論、第三方報導),而這些足跡決定了 AI 引擎是否會檢索某個品牌;Kuroma 的能見度掃描與站外訊號負責追蹤那一面。 評分方式說明
檢測你自己的網站 →