Kuroma Kuroma

dekewe.com 的 AI Readiness 實測 27/100

德科維聯合科技股份有限公司 (dekewe.com) 的 AI Readiness 實測為 27/100(F 級),檢測日期 2026 年 9 月 10 日。 表現最強的是技術(51 分),最弱的是AI 就緒度(8 分);最大的單一缺口是問題涵蓋度與 FAQ 存在與否,0/100(No FAQ schema markup detected)。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 30,898 個網站 中,這個分數低於中位數。

檢測網址: https://dekewe.com

27/100
等級
F

能挽回最多分數的檢查項目是值得被引用度:這項占總分 7.5%,只拿到 0/100,讓總分少了 7.5 分。

5 天前更新

在所有受測網站中低於中位數 中位數 39 · 前四分之一門檻 45 · 樣本為 30,898 個受測網站

dekewe.com 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎?

還沒有:dekewe.com 的實測分數為 27/100(F 級)。 先從這裡開始: Add FAQ Schema Markup、Make This Page’s Facts Extractable。

類別分數

頁面內容 占總分 25% 26
技術 占總分 20% 51
權威性 占總分 25% 31
AI 就緒度 占總分 30% 8

優先修正項目(依可挽回的分數排序)

排序依據是各項檢查的占分乘以落差,因此排最前面的是收益最大的修正,不一定是分數最低的檢查。

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content 最多可 +7.5 分

    位於 https://dekewe.com · AI 就緒度 → 值得被引用度, 得分 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers 最多可 +7.2 分

    位於 https://dekewe.com · AI 就緒度 → 答案框潛力, 得分 0/100

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
    • Add a section heading followed by 25 to 200 words that answer it on their own, so an assistant can lift the answer without the rest of the page
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
  3. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access 最多可 +7 分

    位於 https://dekewe.com · 技術 → 可爬取性與可存取性, 得分 46/100

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 14 of 100 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Add canonical tag to prevent duplicate content issues
    • This page opens 31 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  4. Add FAQ Schema Markup 最多可 +6.5 分

    位於 https://dekewe.com · 頁面內容 → 問題涵蓋度與 FAQ 存在與否, 得分 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals 最多可 +6.2 分

    位於 https://dekewe.com · 權威性 → E-E-A-T 訊號, 得分 12/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

全部 19 項評分檢查

公開評分標準的每一項檢查,以及本次檢測在頁面上實際看到的內容。

頁面內容 占總分 25%

  • 內容深度與完整性 部分符合 59/100

    占總分 6.5%

    Found: 486 words, 4 paragraphs, 28 lists, 21 images (10 with alt text)

    • Content length (486 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 11 images missing alt text (e.g. images/index_brand_logo.png, images/index_brand_logo2.png, images/index_brand_logo3.png)
  • 占總分 6.5%

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • 結構化資料品質 未通過 9/100

    占總分 4.5%

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI 可讀性分數 部分符合 54/100

    占總分 3%

    Average 28 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. No text formatting.

    • Average sentence length (28 words) is too long for easy AI parsing
    • 1 sentences exceed 25 words
  • 標題階層 未通過 0/100

    占總分 2.8%

    H1: 0, H2: 0, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • No headings a reader can see
  • 媒體無障礙性 待改善 32/100

    占總分 1.8%

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 11 of 21 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 3 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Swiss implant", "Dr.Wells", "RS植體").
    • 11 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 21 images but only ~486 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

技術 占總分 20%

  • Schema 標記完整性 待改善 40/100

    占總分 1%

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • 頁面效能指標 部分符合 68/100

    占總分 2%

    16 render-blocking resources. 433 elements for 486 words

    • 16 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • 行動裝置優化 部分符合 60/100

    占總分 4%

    Has viewport

  • 可爬取性與可存取性 待改善 46/100

    占總分 13%

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. No robots.txt, so nothing blocks AI crawlers. 14 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 14 of 100 links cannot be followed by a crawler

權威性 占總分 25%

  • E-E-A-T 訊號 未通過 12/100

    占總分 7%

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 6/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • 外部引用與參考來源 待改善 35/100

    占總分 9%

    12 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • 信任與品牌訊號 待改善 42/100

    占總分 9%

    Present: About page, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (2)

    • No privacy policy link found

AI 就緒度 占總分 30%

  • 答案框潛力 未通過 0/100

    占總分 7.2%

    0 of 0 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
  • 值得被引用度 未通過 0/100

    占總分 7.5%

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • 內容新鮮度 未通過 16/100

    占總分 5.7%

    No recent year references. Last modified: 7/1/2016

    • No recent year references in content
    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
  • 獨特價值主張 未通過 0/100

    占總分 5.1%

    0 of 19 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI 可發現性 未檢測 43/100

    占總分 3%

    Score: 43/100

  • 原始 HTML 可用性 未通過 10/100

    占總分 1.5%

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

本次檢測衡量的是引用就緒度:AI 引擎能多容易地爬取、擷取並引述這些頁面。它無法看見站外品牌足跡(提及、評論、第三方報導),而這些足跡決定了 AI 引擎是否會檢索某個品牌;Kuroma 的能見度掃描與站外訊號負責追蹤那一面。 評分方式說明

檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站?認領這張成績單