Kuroma Kuroma

home33.com.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 50/100

三商美福室內設計 (home33.com.tw) 是 Interior Design Firms 類網站;Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 50/100(B 級),檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 20 日。 表現最強的是技術(73 分),最弱的是AI 就緒度(42 分);最大的單一缺口是結構化資料品質,0/100(No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 24 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar)。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 30,898 個網站 中,這個分數排在前四分之一。

檢測網址: https://home33.com.tw

50/100
等級
B

能挽回最多分數的檢查項目是值得被引用度:這項占總分 7.5%,只拿到 0/100,讓總分少了 7.5 分。

這次檢測距今已 26 天。AI 的回答會隨時間改變,現在 AI 搜尋看到的情況可能和這張成績單不同。

26 天前更新

在所有受測網站中排前 25% 中位數 39 · 前四分之一門檻 45 · 樣本為 30,898 個受測網站

home33.com.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎?

大致可以,仍有缺口:home33.com.tw 的實測分數為 50/100(B 級)。 要補的缺口是 Make This Page’s Facts Extractable、Add FAQ Schema Markup。

類別分數

頁面內容 占總分 25% 46
技術 占總分 20% 73
權威性 占總分 25% 47
AI 就緒度 占總分 30% 42

優先修正項目(依可挽回的分數排序)

排序依據是各項檢查的占分乘以落差,因此排最前面的是收益最大的修正,不一定是分數最低的檢查。

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content 最多可 +7.5 分

    位於 https://home33.com.tw · AI 就緒度 → 值得被引用度, 得分 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals 最多可 +5.2 分

    位於 https://home33.com.tw · 權威性 → E-E-A-T 訊號, 得分 26/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup 最多可 +4.9 分

    位於 https://home33.com.tw · 頁面內容 → 問題涵蓋度與 FAQ 存在與否, 得分 25/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Improve Unique Value Proposition 最多可 +4.8 分

    位於 https://home33.com.tw · AI 就緒度 → 獨特價值主張, 得分 5/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable 最多可 +4.5 分

    位於 https://home33.com.tw · 頁面內容 → 結構化資料品質, 得分 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 24 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items

全部 19 項評分檢查

公開評分標準的每一項檢查,以及本次檢測在頁面上實際看到的內容。

頁面內容 占總分 25%

  • 內容深度與完整性 通過 89/100

    占總分 6.5%

    Found: 4281 words, 14 paragraphs, 26 lists, 88 images (3 with alt text)

    • 85 images missing alt text
  • 占總分 6.5%

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • 結構化資料品質 未通過 0/100

    占總分 4.5%

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: BreadcrumbList

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 24 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI 可讀性分數 部分符合 61/100

    占總分 3%

    Average 16 words/sentence. 32 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • 標題階層 部分符合 56/100

    占總分 2.8%

    H1: 1, H2: 5, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • 媒體無障礙性 待改善 36/100

    占總分 1.8%

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 85 of 88 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 85 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 88 images but only ~4281 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

技術 占總分 20%

  • Schema 標記完整性 通過 100/100

    占總分 1%

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • 頁面效能指標 待改善 35/100

    占總分 2%

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (4121ms). 93 render-blocking resources. 2731 elements for 4281 words

    • Server response was slow (4121ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
    • 93 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • 行動裝置優化 部分符合 70/100

    占總分 4%

    Has viewport. 2 responsive images

  • 占總分 13%

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. 1 AI crawler(s) blocked: PerplexityBot. 6 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 6 of 266 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • 1 AI visibility crawler(s) blocked in robots.txt: PerplexityBot. Blocking these removes the site from the corresponding AI engines' answers.
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended, Meta-ExternalAgent, Amazonbot, CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not …

權威性 占總分 25%

  • E-E-A-T 訊號 待改善 26/100

    占總分 7%

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
  • 外部引用與參考來源 部分符合 50/100

    占總分 9%

    14 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. Has references section.

  • 信任與品牌訊號 部分符合 60/100

    占總分 9%

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI 就緒度 占總分 30%

  • 答案框潛力 待改善 44/100

    占總分 7.2%

    3 of 10 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • 值得被引用度 未通過 0/100

    占總分 7.5%

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • 內容新鮮度 通過 92/100

    占總分 5.7%

    References current year. Last modified: 6/2/2026

  • 獨特價值主張 未通過 5/100

    占總分 5.1%

    0 of 173 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 2 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI 可發現性 未檢測 85/100

    占總分 3%

    Score: 85/100

  • 原始 HTML 可用性 通過 100/100

    占總分 1.5%

    4281 words readable without JavaScript

本次檢測衡量的是引用就緒度:AI 引擎能多容易地爬取、擷取並引述這些頁面。它無法看見站外品牌足跡(提及、評論、第三方報導),而這些足跡決定了 AI 引擎是否會檢索某個品牌;Kuroma 的能見度掃描與站外訊號負責追蹤那一面。 評分方式說明

檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站?認領這張成績單

其他還沒有公開成績單的 Interior Design Firms 類網站

這些網站目前還沒有公開的 AI Readiness 成績單。選一個就能免費檢測;要在下一頁按下確認才會開始。