Kuroma Kuroma

sunho.store scores 66/100 for AI Readiness

SUNHOSEKI (sunho.store) is a E-commerce Platform site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 66/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (87) and its weakest is Authority Signals (52); the biggest single gap is Media Accessibility at 25/100 (125 of 172 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.). That places it in the top quartile of the 100 E-commerce Platform sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://sunho.store

66/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in E-commerce Platform Median 43 · Top quartile 53 · across 100 audited sites in E-commerce Platform

Is sunho.store ready for AI search?

Largely yes: sunho.store scores 66/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make Media Machine-Readable to AI and Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 63
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 87
Authority Signals 25% of the score 52
AI Readiness 30% of the score 66

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5 pts

    On https://sunho.store · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 28/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://sunho.store · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +3.5 pts

    On https://sunho.store · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 51/100

    • 5 of your 28 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
  4. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +3.2 pts

    On https://sunho.store · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 51/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3 pts

    On https://sunho.store · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 34/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2480 words, 81 paragraphs, 25 lists, 172 images (47 with alt text)

    • 125 images missing alt text (e.g. //sunho.store/cdn/shop/files/ban_260807_kitsale.jpg?v=1786026028&width=1200, //sunho.store/cdn/shop/files/ban_260806_sticker.jpg?v=1785983546&width=1200, //sunho.store/cdn/shop/files/sl_260807_myhoppe.jpg?…
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 51/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 3 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 34/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite

  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 75/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 6, H3: 22. Proper hierarchy.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 25/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 125 of 172 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 22 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("SUNHOSEKI", "楽天 ペイ", "LINE").
    • 117 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 172 images but only ~2480 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 51/100

    2% of the overall score

    43 render-blocking resources. 3599 elements for 2480 words

    • 43 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 83/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 68 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 94/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 23 placeholder links

    • 23 of 372 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 28/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    28 external links, 0 citation phrases, 22 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 69/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (5)

    • No about or company page linked from this page

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 51/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    5 of 28 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Pass 80/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Partial 59/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 7/7/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 54/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    12 of 202 passages carry a figure, 6 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 81/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 81/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2480 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for E-commerce Platform · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai