Kuroma Kuroma

mot-net.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 52/100

雲端總機 MOT/BIZPhone 行動分機、公司代表號申請 (mot-net.tw) 是 IT Infrastructure / Cloud 類網站；Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 52/100（B 級），檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 20 日。 表現最強的是技術（68 分），最弱的是權威性（39 分）；最大的單一缺口是 E-E-A-T Signals，0/100（No author attribution found）。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 446 個 IT Infrastructure / Cloud 類網站 中，這個分數排在前四分之一。

Audited URL: https://mot-net.tw

52/100
Grade
B

Good foundation. Implementing recommendations could significantly boost visibility.

Updated today

Top 25% in IT Infrastructure / Cloud Median 41 · Top quartile 47 · across 446 audited sites in IT Infrastructure / Cloud

mot-net.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎？

大致可以，仍有缺口：mot-net.tw 的實測分數為 52/100（B 級）。 要補的缺口是 Add FAQ Schema Markup、Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals。

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 61
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 68
Authority Signals 25% of the score 39
AI Readiness 30% of the score 44

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +7 pts

    On https://mot-net.tw · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 0/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  2. Add Trust Signals up to +4.8 pts

    On https://mot-net.tw · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 47/100

    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +4.6 pts

    On https://mot-net.tw · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 29/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.2 pts

    On https://mot-net.tw · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 44/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  5. Update Content Freshness up to +4 pts

    On https://mot-net.tw · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 30/100

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 84/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1515 words, 45 paragraphs, 25 lists, 27 images (19 with alt text)

    • 8 images missing alt text (e.g. /img/icon_line.png, /img/mot-tel/cloud-pbx-mobile-interface-1_16_11zon.png, /img/mot-tel/cloud-pbx-all-support_9_11zon.webp)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 29/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 34/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Pass 95/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 10 words/sentence. 6 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 5, H3: 19. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 48/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 8 of 27 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 4 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("step1", "step2", "MOTBizphone").
    • 22 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Fail 20/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    20 render-blocking resources. 705 elements for 1515 words

    • 20 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 74/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 2 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 0/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 60/100

    9% of the overall score

    16 external links, 1 citation phrases, 3 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 47/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (3)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 50/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    8 of 25 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 44/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 30/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year

    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 29/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    5 of 112 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 52/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 52/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1515 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for IT Infrastructure / Cloud · Run a free AI Readiness audit

這是你經營的網站？ 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單 · 申請移除這張成績單

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai