Kuroma Kuroma

cross-m.co.jp scores 65/100 for AI Readiness

【公式】 (cross-m.co.jp) is a Consulting / Professional Services site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 65/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is On-Page Content (81) and its weakest is Authority Signals (57); the biggest single gap is Unique Value Proposition at 14/100 (3 of 282 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.). That places it in the top quartile of the 1195 Consulting / Professional Services sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://cross-m.co.jp

65/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in Consulting / Professional Services Median 39 · Top quartile 45 · across 1195 audited sites in Consulting / Professional Services

Is cross-m.co.jp ready for AI search?

Largely yes: cross-m.co.jp scores 65/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Improve Unique Value Proposition and Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 81
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 63
Authority Signals 25% of the score 57
AI Readiness 30% of the score 59

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +5.6 pts

    On https://cross-m.co.jp · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 57/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • The response at cross-m.co.jp is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • Serve a plain-text robots.txt at cross-m.co.jp — the response we received could not be parsed as one
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.6 pts

    On https://cross-m.co.jp · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 35/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.4 pts

    On https://cross-m.co.jp · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 14/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  4. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://cross-m.co.jp · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  5. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +3.8 pts

    On https://cross-m.co.jp · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 47/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • 8 of your 41 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses

The 17 checks scored on this page

Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 2 more checks were not scored on this page and are listed below with no score.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    9.7% of the overall score

    Found: 3388 words, 15 paragraphs, 14 lists, 51 images (9 with alt text)

    • 42 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 47/100

    6.7% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Corporation, WebSite, ItemList, BreadcrumbList

  • AI Readability Score Pass 95/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 5 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    4.1% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 8, H3: 12. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 41 of 50 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 6 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Cross Marketing", "LinkedIn", "Facebook").
    • 36 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 60/100

    2% of the overall score

    31 render-blocking resources. 1956 elements for 3388 words

    • 31 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 16 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 57/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 6 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • The response at cross-m.co.jp is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 35/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    14 external links, 0 citation phrases, 7 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Pass 77/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 47/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    8 of 41 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Pass 84/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Partial 73/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/20/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 14/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    3 of 282 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 51/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 51/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    3388 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Consulting / Professional Services · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai