Kuroma Kuroma

newsveg.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 55/100

生鮮時書：讓知識為你所用 (newsveg.tw) 是 EdTech / LMS 類網站；Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 55/100（B 級），檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 20 日。 表現最強的是技術（92 分），最弱的是權威性（37 分）；最大的單一缺口是 Structured Data Quality，0/100（No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 6 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar）。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 103 個 EdTech 類網站 中，這個分數排在前四分之一。

Audited URL: https://newsveg.tw

55/100
Grade
B

Good foundation. Implementing recommendations could significantly boost visibility.

Updated today

Top 25% in EdTech Median 48 · Top quartile 55 · across 103 audited sites in EdTech

newsveg.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎？

大致可以，仍有缺口：newsveg.tw 的實測分數為 55/100（B 級）。 要補的缺口是 Make This Page’s Facts Extractable、Improve Unique Value Proposition。

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 53
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 92
Authority Signals 25% of the score 37
AI Readiness 30% of the score 48

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6.1 pts

    On https://newsveg.tw · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 13/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +5.1 pts

    On https://newsveg.tw · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 43/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  3. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.7 pts

    On https://newsveg.tw · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 8/100

    • Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  4. Add Trust Signals up to +4.6 pts

    On https://newsveg.tw · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 49/100

    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://newsveg.tw · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 6 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 81/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2058 words, 3 paragraphs, 35 lists, 19 images (3 with alt text)

    • 16 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 73/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 9 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 6 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Needs work 35/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 15 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

    • No block of writing on this page reads as a paragraph, so paragraph length could not be judged
  • Heading Hierarchy Needs work 49/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 6, H2: 25, H3: 50. Hierarchy issues.

    • Multiple H1 headings (6) - should have exactly one
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 48/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 16 of 19 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 17 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 80/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 60/100

    2% of the overall score

    75 render-blocking resources. 1825 elements for 2058 words

    • 75 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 17 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 100/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 2 placeholder links

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 13/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 17/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 43/100

    9% of the overall score

    13 external links, 0 citation phrases, 1 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 49/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (3)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 69/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    13 of 83 headings open a quotable passage, 2 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 40/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 57/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 11/2/2023

    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 8/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    1 of 100 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 41/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 41/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2058 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for EdTech / LMS · Run a free AI Readiness audit

這是你經營的網站？ 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單 · 申請移除這張成績單

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai