Kuroma Kuroma

mmdc.com.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 50/100

MMdc 關鍵數位行銷 (mmdc.com.tw) 是 EdTech / LMS 類網站；Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 50/100（B 級），檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 20 日。 表現最強的是技術（80 分），最弱的是頁面內容（40 分）；最大的單一缺口是 Question Coverage & FAQ Presence，0/100（No FAQ schema markup detected）。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 253 個 MarTech 類網站 中，這個分數低於中位數。

Audited URL: https://mmdc.com.tw

50/100
Grade
B

Good foundation. Implementing recommendations could significantly boost visibility.

Updated today

Below the median in MarTech Median 53 · Top quartile 58 · across 253 audited sites in MarTech

mmdc.com.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎？

大致可以，仍有缺口：mmdc.com.tw 的實測分數為 50/100（B 級）。 要補的缺口是 Add FAQ Schema Markup、Make This Page’s Facts Extractable。

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 40
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 80
Authority Signals 25% of the score 40
AI Readiness 30% of the score 48

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +7 pts

    On https://mmdc.com.tw · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 0/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  2. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://mmdc.com.tw · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  3. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://mmdc.com.tw · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 5 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  4. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.2 pts

    On https://mmdc.com.tw · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 44/100

    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  5. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://mmdc.com.tw · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 65/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 956 words, 2 paragraphs, 6 lists, 11 images (6 with alt text)

    • Content length (956 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 5 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage, WebSite

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 5 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Pass 94/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 13 words/sentence. 4 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 85/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 3, H2: 8, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • Multiple H1 headings (3) - should have exactly one
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 35/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 5 of 11 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 3 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("default-logo", "BenQ", "淘寶網").
    • 9 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • 1 video(s) have no transcript or captions, so AI search treats them as a blank space.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 35/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (3972ms). 24 render-blocking resources. 683 elements for 956 words

    • Server response was slow (3972ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
    • 24 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 4 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 5 placeholder links

    • 5 of 54 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 0/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    7 external links, 0 citation phrases, 5 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 56/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (2)

    • No privacy policy link found

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 51/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    7 of 15 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 44/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 5 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 32/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references. Last modified: 12/5/2023

    • No recent year references in content
    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 45/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    3 of 57 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 58/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 58/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    956 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for EdTech / LMS · Run a free AI Readiness audit

這是你經營的網站？ 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單 · 申請移除這張成績單

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai