www.thenewslens.com 的 AI Readiness 實測 60/100
TNL The News Lens 關鍵評論網 (www.thenewslens.com) 是 出版/新聞媒體 類網站;Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 60/100(A 級),檢測日期 2026 年 9 月 16 日。 表現最強的是技術(88 分),最弱的是AI 就緒度(45 分);最大的單一缺口是結構化資料品質,9/100(3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, Organization, WebPage)。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 3,009 個 媒體與娛樂 類網站 中,這個分數排在前四分之一。
檢測網址: https://www.thenewslens.com
能挽回最多分數的檢查項目是值得被引用度:這項占總分 7.5%,只拿到 24/100,讓總分少了 5.7 分。
在 媒體與娛樂 類別中排前 25% 中位數 37 · 前四分之一門檻 43 · 樣本為 3,009 個受測網站(媒體與娛樂 類別)
www.thenewslens.com 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎?
大致準備好了:www.thenewslens.com 的實測分數為 60/100(A 級)。 剩下要補的是 Make This Page’s Facts Extractable、Improve Raw HTML Availability。
類別分數
優先修正項目(依可挽回的分數排序)
排序依據是各項檢查的占分乘以落差,因此排最前面的是收益最大的修正,不一定是分數最低的檢查。
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content 最多可 +5.7 分
位於 https://www.thenewslens.com · AI 就緒度 → 值得被引用度, 得分 24/100
- Limited use of specific statistics
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Add External Citations & References 最多可 +4.5 分
位於 https://www.thenewslens.com · 權威性 → 外部引用與參考來源, 得分 50/100
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Add a references or sources section
-
Improve Unique Value Proposition 最多可 +4.2 分
位於 https://www.thenewslens.com · AI 就緒度 → 獨特價值主張, 得分 17/100
- Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
- Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
- Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
-
Make This Page’s Facts Extractable 最多可 +4.1 分
位於 https://www.thenewslens.com · 頁面內容 → 結構化資料品質, 得分 9/100
- Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
-
Add Trust Signals 最多可 +3.8 分
位於 https://www.thenewslens.com · 權威性 → 信任與品牌訊號, 得分 58/100
- No privacy policy link found
- Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
- Your Organization schema declares 4 of the identity properties engines read; add the rest (name, url, logo, sameAs, contactPoint, address)
- Add customer testimonials or reviews
全部 19 項評分檢查
公開評分標準的每一項檢查,以及本次檢測在頁面上實際看到的內容。
頁面內容 占總分 25%
-
占總分 6.5%
Found: 2,478 words, 22 paragraphs, 36 lists, 73 images (61 with alt text)
- 12 images missing alt text
-
占總分 6.5%
No FAQ structure. 19 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
-
占總分 4.5%
3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, Organization, WebPage
-
占總分 3%
Average 13 words/sentence. 11 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
占總分 2.8%
H1: 0, H2: 14, H3: 23. Hierarchy issues.
- Missing H1 heading
- Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
-
占總分 1.8%
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 12 of 73 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 1 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("IMG_1679") that tells AI nothing about the content.
- 34 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("kv3", "og_WBCQ2025", "GettyImages-2186618705").
- 54 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
技術 占總分 20%
-
占總分 1%
3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
占總分 2%
Fetch succeeded but was slow (39005ms). 8 render-blocking resources. 1,694 elements for 2,478 words
- Server response was slow (39005ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
-
占總分 4%
Has viewport. 51 responsive images
-
占總分 13%
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 8 placeholder links
- 8 of 382 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- Informational: ChatGPT-User blocked in robots.txt. These tokens cover on-demand user fetches and platforms may not apply robots.txt to those requests; reported for information, not scored.
- Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Meta-ExternalAgent, Amazonbot, CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.
權威性 占總分 25%
-
占總分 7%
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 14/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 10/25. Has author
-
占總分 9%
15 external links, 0 citation phrases, 4 statistics. No references section.
-
占總分 9%
Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Contact, Social profiles (6)
- No privacy policy link found
AI 就緒度 占總分 30%
-
占總分 7.2%
7 of 65 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures
-
占總分 7.5%
0 original data indicators, 4 percentages, 0 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
占總分 5.7%
References current year. Last modified: 9/16/2026
-
占總分 5.1%
4 of 114 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
-
占總分 3%
Score: 62/100
-
占總分 1.5%
This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none
- This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.
本次檢測衡量的是引用就緒度:AI 引擎能多容易地爬取、擷取並引述這些頁面。它無法看見站外品牌足跡(提及、評論、第三方報導),而這些足跡決定了 AI 引擎是否會檢索某個品牌;Kuroma 的能見度掃描與站外訊號負責追蹤那一面。 評分方式說明
檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站?認領這張成績單其他 出版/新聞媒體 類網站的成績單
- 聯合新聞網 (udn.com) · 70/100
- 머니투데이 (mt.co.kr) · 69/100
- 首頁 (jointpublishing.com) · 67/100
- Marie Claire (marieclaire.com) · 67/100
- VICE is the definitive guide to enlightening information (vice.com) · 67/100
- TechCrunch (techcrunch.com) · 67/100
其他還沒有公開成績單的 出版/新聞媒體 類網站
這些網站目前還沒有公開的 AI Readiness 成績單。選一個就能免費檢測;要在下一頁按下確認才會開始。