Kuroma Kuroma

jytdesign.com.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 69/100

居雅堂 (jytdesign.com.tw) 是 Retail Tech / POS 類網站；Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 69/100（A 級），檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 20 日。 表現最強的是技術（89 分），最弱的是權威性（53 分）；最大的單一缺口是 E-E-A-T Signals，13/100（No author attribution found）。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 100 個 Retail Tech / POS 類網站 中，這個分數排在前四分之一。

Audited URL: https://jytdesign.com.tw

69/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in Retail Tech / POS Median 42 · Top quartile 49 · across 100 audited sites in Retail Tech / POS

jytdesign.com.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎？

大致準備好了：jytdesign.com.tw 的實測分數為 69/100（A 級）。 剩下要補的是 Make This Page’s Facts Extractable、Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals。

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 70
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 89
Authority Signals 25% of the score 53
AI Readiness 30% of the score 68

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6.1 pts

    On https://jytdesign.com.tw · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 13/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +5.6 pts

    On https://jytdesign.com.tw · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 16/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  3. Add Trust Signals up to +4 pts

    On https://jytdesign.com.tw · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 56/100

    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews
  4. Update Content Freshness up to +3.8 pts

    On https://jytdesign.com.tw · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 33/100

    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  5. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +3.5 pts

    On https://jytdesign.com.tw · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 52/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
    • Add FAQ section with common questions about your topic

The 17 checks scored on this page

Every check this audit scored, with what it found on the page. 2 more checks were not scored on this page and are listed below with no score.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    9.7% of the overall score

    Found: 5630 words, 60 paragraphs, 20 lists, 140 images (123 with alt text)

    • 17 images missing alt text (e.g. //www.jytdesign.com.tw/cdn/shop/files/4a7a9004c068615d2de5c30d0da635b5_73b75452-6db6-43b9-a1fc-c534ce2cf7c3_2000x1120.jpg?v=1745202059, //www.jytdesign.com.tw/cdn/shop/files/Gabri_800x575.jpg?v=1745202413, …
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 16/100

    6.7% of the overall score

    3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, ItemList, WebSite

  • AI Readability Score Pass 84/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    Average 11 words/sentence. 49 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 75/100

    4.1% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 70, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.

    • Missing H1 heading
  • Media Accessibility Not applicable

    Not scored on this page; its weight was spread across the other checks in this category

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 17 of 140 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 14 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("320x120_kristalia.png__PID:9a100844-0026-4714-be01-031a3fc8217c", "320x120_muuto.png__PID:031a3fc8-217c-460e-a946-694931a7c1df", "320x120_louis poulsen.png__PID:694931a7-c1df-4…
    • 139 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 140 images but only ~5630 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 90/100

    2% of the overall score

    3 render-blocking resources. 3549 elements for 5630 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 140 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 93/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 6 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 13/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Pass 80/100

    9% of the overall score

    7 external links, 1 citation phrases, 316 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 56/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Publisher schema (6 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (2)

    • No about or company page linked from this page

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 52/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    49 of 70 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Pass 80/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 1 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 33/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References last year. Last modified: 12/24/2025

    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
  • Unique Value Proposition Pass 95/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    56 of 244 passages carry a figure, 48 set two figures against each other, 3 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 81/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 81/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    5630 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Retail Tech / POS · Run a free AI Readiness audit

這是你經營的網站？ 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單 · 申請移除這張成績單

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai