Kuroma
tw.yahoo.com 的 AI Readiness 實測 57/100
Yahoo (tw.yahoo.com) 是 其他 類網站；Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 57/100（B 級），檢測日期 2026 年 9 月 10 日。 表現最強的是技術（82 分），最弱的是權威性（30 分）；最大的單一缺口是 E-E-A-T 訊號，0/100（No author attribution found）。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 425 個 其他 類網站 中，這個分數排在前四分之一。
檢測網址: https://tw.yahoo.com
能挽回最多分數的檢查項目是 E-E-A-T 訊號：這項占總分 7%，只拿到 0/100，讓總分少了 7 分。
在 其他 類別中排前 25% 中位數 37 · 前四分之一門檻 42 · 樣本為 425 個受測網站（其他 類別）
tw.yahoo.com 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎？
大致可以，仍有缺口：tw.yahoo.com 的實測分數為 57/100（B 級）。 要補的缺口是 Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access、Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals。
類別分數
優先修正項目（依可挽回的分數排序）
排序依據是各項檢查的占分乘以落差，因此排最前面的是收益最大的修正，不一定是分數最低的檢查。
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals 最多可 +7 分
位於 https://tw.yahoo.com · 權威性 → E-E-A-T 訊號, 得分 0/100
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Add Trust Signals 最多可 +6.6 分
位於 https://tw.yahoo.com · 權威性 → 信任與品牌訊號, 得分 27/100
- No about or company page linked from this page
- No contact information easily accessible
- Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
- Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
- Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)
-
Add External Citations & References 最多可 +4.1 分
位於 https://tw.yahoo.com · 權威性 → 外部引用與參考來源, 得分 55/100
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Add a references or sources section
-
Update Content Freshness 最多可 +4 分
位於 https://tw.yahoo.com · AI 就緒度 → 內容新鮮度, 得分 30/100
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
- Update statistics and data to 2026
- Add article:modified_time meta tag
- Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
-
Improve Unique Value Proposition 最多可 +3.9 分
位於 https://tw.yahoo.com · AI 就緒度 → 獨特價值主張, 得分 24/100
- Most passages describe the offer in general terms; carry the figures into them rather than leaving them in one panel
- Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
- Name the versions, models and standards you actually work with instead of describing them in general terms
全部 19 項評分檢查
公開評分標準的每一項檢查，以及本次檢測在頁面上實際看到的內容。
頁面內容 占總分 25%
-
占總分 6.5%
Found: 1,936 words, 59 paragraphs, 16 lists, 64 images (31 with alt text)
- 33 images missing alt text
-
占總分 6.5%
No FAQ structure. 7 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
-
占總分 4.5%
No JSON-LD structured data found
-
占總分 3%
Average 11 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
占總分 2.8%
H1: 0, H2: 3, H3: 61. Proper hierarchy.
- Missing H1 heading
-
占總分 1.8%
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 33 of 64 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 9 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Yahoo", "陰", "局部多雲").
- 30 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- This page has 64 images but only ~1,936 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
技術 占總分 20%
-
占總分 1%
0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph
-
占總分 2%
6 render-blocking resources. 1,743 elements for 1,936 words
-
占總分 4%
Has viewport. 5 responsive images
-
占總分 13%
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. 1 AI crawler(s) blocked: PerplexityBot. 1 placeholder links
- 1 AI visibility crawler(s) blocked in robots.txt: PerplexityBot. Blocking these removes the site from the corresponding AI engines' answers.
- Informational: ChatGPT-User blocked in robots.txt. These tokens cover on-demand user fetches and platforms may not apply robots.txt to those requests; reported for information, not scored.
- Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.
- Informational: robots.txt references legacy AI crawler token(s): anthropic-ai, claude-web. Vendors no longer document these; migrate to the current tokens (for Anthropic: ClaudeBot, Claude-SearchBot, Claude-User).
權威性 占總分 25%
-
占總分 7%
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
占總分 9%
14 external links, 0 citation phrases, 13 statistics. No references section.
-
占總分 9%
Present: Privacy Policy, Social profiles (4)
- No about or company page linked from this page
- No contact information easily accessible
AI 就緒度 占總分 30%
-
占總分 7.2%
1 of 64 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures
- No FAQ structure detected
-
占總分 7.5%
0 original data indicators, 12 percentages, 0 quotes.
-
占總分 5.7%
References current year
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
占總分 5.1%
5 of 150 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
-
占總分 3%
Score: 76/100
-
占總分 1.5%
1,936 words readable without JavaScript
本次檢測衡量的是引用就緒度：AI 引擎能多容易地爬取、擷取並引述這些頁面。它無法看見站外品牌足跡（提及、評論、第三方報導），而這些足跡決定了 AI 引擎是否會檢索某個品牌；Kuroma 的能見度掃描與站外訊號負責追蹤那一面。 評分方式說明
檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單其他 其他 類網站的成績單
- 結婚相談所 (zwei.com) · 68/100
- onet.co.jp · 68/100
- Photo Mosaic (photographic-mosaic.com) · 65/100
- Zapier (zapier.com) · 61/100
- AI智慧城市開創者 中興保全科技 (www.secom.com.tw) · 27/100
其他還沒有公開成績單的 其他 類網站
這些網站目前還沒有公開的 AI Readiness 成績單。選一個就能免費檢測；要在下一頁按下確認才會開始。