Kuroma Kuroma

jetgo.com.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 38/100

Jet-Go Consulting Group 戰國策傳播集團｜公共政策與品牌公關顧問 (jetgo.com.tw) 是 MarTech / Marketing Platform 類網站；Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 38/100（D 級），檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 20 日。 表現最強的是技術（77 分），最弱的是AI 就緒度（17 分）；最大的單一缺口是 Question Coverage & FAQ Presence，0/100（No FAQ schema markup detected）。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 253 個 MarTech 類網站 中，這個分數低於中位數。

Audited URL: https://jetgo.com.tw

38/100
Grade
D

Needs work. Several areas require attention for better AI visibility.

Updated today

Below the median in MarTech Median 53 · Top quartile 58 · across 253 audited sites in MarTech

jetgo.com.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎？

還沒有：jetgo.com.tw 的實測分數為 38/100（D 級）。 先從這裡開始： Add FAQ Schema Markup、Make This Page’s Facts Extractable。

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 36
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 77
Authority Signals 25% of the score 35
AI Readiness 30% of the score 17

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://jetgo.com.tw · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +6.8 pts

    On https://jetgo.com.tw · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 25/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://jetgo.com.tw · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts

    On https://jetgo.com.tw · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.2 pts

    On https://jetgo.com.tw · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 26/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 53/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 166 words, 2 paragraphs, 2 lists, 10 images (10 with alt text)

    • Content length (166 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Corporation

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 2 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 70/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 13 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 2, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 37/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 7 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("戰國策", "tel", "fax").
    • 3 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 10 images but only ~166 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 80/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 100/100

    2% of the overall score

    2 render-blocking resources. 153 elements for 166 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 1 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 75/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 26/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 6/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 25/100

    9% of the overall score

    4 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 53/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 52/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    2 of 3 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 9 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 44/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 44/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for MarTech / Marketing Platform · Run a free AI Readiness audit

這是你經營的網站？ 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單 · 申請移除這張成績單

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai