Kuroma Kuroma

shinagawa.com scores 69/100 for AI Readiness

品川美容外科【公式】 (shinagawa.com) is a Healthcare Services site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 69/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (79) and its weakest is Authority Signals (42); the biggest single gap is Raw HTML Availability at 10/100 (This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.). That places it in the top quartile of the 210 Healthcare Services sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://shinagawa.com

69/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in Healthcare Services Median 37.5 · Top quartile 42 · across 210 audited sites in Healthcare Services

Is shinagawa.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: shinagawa.com scores 69/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Improve Raw HTML Availability and Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 77
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 79
Authority Signals 25% of the score 42
AI Readiness 30% of the score 79

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.2 pts

    On https://shinagawa.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 26/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  2. Add Trust Signals up to +5.2 pts

    On https://shinagawa.com · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 42/100

    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
    • Your Organization schema declares 2 of the identity properties engines read; add the rest (name, url, logo, sameAs, contactPoint, address)
    • Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://shinagawa.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  4. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +2.2 pts

    On https://shinagawa.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 52/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page
  5. Improve AI Readability Score up to +2 pts

    On https://shinagawa.com · On-Page Content → AI Readability Score, scored 35/100

    • No block of writing on this page reads as a paragraph, so paragraph length could not be judged
    • Write the page content as paragraphs of prose, rather than as headings or lists of links
    • Use bold text to highlight key terms and phrases

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 5346 words, 217 paragraphs, 69 lists, 8 tables, 161 images (156 with alt text)

    • 5 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 17 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Partial 52/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: FAQPage, MedicalWebPage

  • AI Readability Score Needs work 35/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 8 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.

    • No block of writing on this page reads as a paragraph, so paragraph length could not be judged
  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 67/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 15, H3: 14. Hierarchy issues.

    • Missing H1 heading
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Partial 57/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 2 of 158 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 3 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("SHINAGAWA", "QRコード", "SHINAGAWA").
    • 115 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 158 images but only ~5346 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Partial 70/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    19 render-blocking resources. 3261 elements for 5346 words

    • 19 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 5 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 17 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 17 of 452 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 26/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 6/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    68 external links, 0 citation phrases, 45 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Needs work 42/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: Publisher schema (2 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Social profiles (4)

    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Pass 80/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    8 of 81 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 9 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Pass 100/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 3 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 83/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/10/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Partial 61/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    25 of 384 passages carry a figure, 22 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 81/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 81/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Fail 10/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none

    • This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Healthcare Services · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai