Kuroma Kuroma

health-hd.jp scores 64/100 for AI Readiness

バーチャルオフィスの選び方 (health-hd.jp) is a Healthcare Services site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 64/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is AI Readiness (76) and its weakest is Technical Optimization (41); the biggest single gap is Structured Data Quality at 0/100 (No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 60 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar). That places it in the top quartile of the 210 Healthcare Services sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://health-hd.jp

64/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in Healthcare Services Median 37.5 · Top quartile 42 · across 210 audited sites in Healthcare Services

Is health-hd.jp ready for AI search?

Largely yes: health-hd.jp scores 64/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 64
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 41
Authority Signals 25% of the score 66
AI Readiness 30% of the score 76

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +9.4 pts

    On https://health-hd.jp · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 28/100

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 120 of 269 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Verify canonical tag points to the correct URL
    • This page opens 0 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://health-hd.jp · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 60 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +3.2 pts

    On https://health-hd.jp · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 51/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Add Trust Signals up to +3.2 pts

    On https://health-hd.jp · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 64/100

    • Your Organization schema declares 2 of the identity properties engines read; add the rest (name, url, logo, sameAs, contactPoint, address)
  5. Update Content Freshness up to +3.1 pts

    On https://health-hd.jp · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 45/100

    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
    • Update statistics and data to 2026
    • Add article:modified_time meta tag
    • Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 9533 words, 194 paragraphs, 52 lists, 12 tables, 29 images (3 with alt text)

    • 26 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 51/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Article

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 60 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Pass 85/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 31 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 3, H3: 11. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Partial 51/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 15 of 18 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 12 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Partial 60/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Needs work 43/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (8728ms). 12 render-blocking resources. 2888 elements for 9533 words

    • Server response was slow (8728ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
    • 12 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 8 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Needs work 28/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. No robots.txt, so nothing blocks AI crawlers. 120 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 120 of 269 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Partial 62/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 14/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 25/25. Has author

  • External Citations & References Partial 70/100

    9% of the overall score

    149 external links, 0 citation phrases, 158 statistics. Has references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 64/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (2 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (3)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 62/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    28 of 48 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 12 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Pass 100/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 12 percentages, 42 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Needs work 45/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References last year. Last modified: 2/12/2025

    • Content appears to be over 6 months old
  • Unique Value Proposition Pass 89/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    96 of 801 passages carry a figure, 55 set two figures against each other, 7 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 74/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 74/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    9533 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Healthcare Services · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai