Kuroma Kuroma

heho.com.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 55/100

Heho健康 (heho.com.tw) 是 Digital Health / Health Tech 類網站；Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 55/100（B 級），檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 20 日。 表現最強的是技術（78 分），最弱的是權威性（39 分）；最大的單一缺口是 Unique Value Proposition，5/100（No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check）。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 3006 個 Media & Entertainment 類網站 中，這個分數排在前四分之一。

Audited URL: https://heho.com.tw

55/100
Grade
B

Good foundation. Implementing recommendations could significantly boost visibility.

Updated today

Top 25% in Media & Entertainment Median 37 · Top quartile 43 · across 3006 audited sites in Media & Entertainment

heho.com.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎？

大致可以，仍有缺口：heho.com.tw 的實測分數為 55/100（B 級）。 要補的缺口是 Make This Page’s Facts Extractable、Improve Unique Value Proposition。

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 60
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 78
Authority Signals 25% of the score 39
AI Readiness 30% of the score 50

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6.1 pts

    On https://heho.com.tw · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 13/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://heho.com.tw · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  3. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +4.8 pts

    On https://heho.com.tw · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 5/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  4. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.5 pts

    On https://heho.com.tw · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 40/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  5. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +3.9 pts

    On https://heho.com.tw · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 46/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • 14 of your 124 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 3411 words, 362 paragraphs, 43 lists, 164 images (21 with alt text)

    • 143 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Partial 52/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 25/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, ImageObject, WebPage, Person, Article

  • AI Readability Score Pass 94/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 9 words/sentence. 10 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 52/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 3, H2: 32, H3: 32. Hierarchy issues.

    • Multiple H1 headings (3) - should have exactly one
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Fail 24/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 143 of 164 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 17 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Heho健康", "Heho健康", "Asambeauty").
    • 96 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 164 images but only ~3411 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 51/100

    2% of the overall score

    31 render-blocking resources. 3834 elements for 3411 words

    • 31 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 85/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 5 responsive images. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 78/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 35 placeholder links

    • 35 of 629 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: GPTBot, Amazonbot. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.
    • Crawl-delay directive may slow AI crawler indexing

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 13/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    47 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 62/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 46/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    14 of 124 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 40/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 18 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Pass 85/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/3/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 5/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 199 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 66/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 66/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    3411 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Digital Health / Health Tech · Run a free AI Readiness audit

這是你經營的網站？ 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單 · 申請移除這張成績單

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai