Kuroma Kuroma

t-e-a.org.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 53/100

社團法人台灣網商協會 Taiwan E-Business (t-e-a.org.tw) 是 MarTech / Marketing Platform 類網站；Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 53/100（B 級），檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 20 日。 表現最強的是技術（68 分），最弱的是權威性（44 分）；最大的單一缺口是 Structured Data Quality，0/100（No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 5 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar）。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 202 個 MarTech / Marketing Platform 類網站 中，這個分數高於中位數。

Audited URL: https://t-e-a.org.tw

53/100
Grade
B

Good foundation. Implementing recommendations could significantly boost visibility.

Updated today

Above the median in MarTech / Marketing Platform Median 49 · Top quartile 56 · across 202 audited sites in MarTech / Marketing Platform

t-e-a.org.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎？

大致可以，仍有缺口：t-e-a.org.tw 的實測分數為 53/100（B 級）。 要補的缺口是 Make This Page’s Facts Extractable、Add FAQ Schema Markup。

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 50
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 68
Authority Signals 25% of the score 44
AI Readiness 30% of the score 53

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://t-e-a.org.tw · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  2. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +5.1 pts

    On https://t-e-a.org.tw · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 0/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  3. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5 pts

    On https://t-e-a.org.tw · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 28/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  4. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.5 pts

    On https://t-e-a.org.tw · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 0/100

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 5 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
    • Present comparable facts as a table with a header row, so an engine can quote a specific value
    • Every list of three or more items on this page sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar — put the page's own enumerable points into a list of three or more items
  5. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +4.5 pts

    On https://t-e-a.org.tw · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 40/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 86/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 973 words, 32 paragraphs, 8 lists, 25 images (25 with alt text)

    • Content length (973 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 36/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ section found (no schema). 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, ImageObject, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 5 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Pass 77/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 13 words/sentence. 6 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Partial 52/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 5, H3: 8. Hierarchy issues.

    • Missing H1 heading
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Partial 51/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 16 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Shorts", "Shorts", "Shorts").
    • 23 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 25 images but only ~973 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 53/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (6380ms). 10 render-blocking resources. 592 elements for 973 words

    • Server response was slow (6380ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 71/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 10 placeholder links

    • 10 of 50 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 28/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    20 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 66/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (7 identity properties), Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (4)

    • No privacy policy link found

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 60/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    7 of 21 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Needs work 40/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Pass 92/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 6/22/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 45 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 60/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 60/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    973 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for MarTech / Marketing Platform · Run a free AI Readiness audit

這是你經營的網站？ 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單 · 申請移除這張成績單

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai