Kuroma Kuroma

scivision.com.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 48/100

科妍生物科技股份有限公司 (scivision.com.tw) 是 Pharma / Biotech 類網站；Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 48/100（C 級），檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 20 日。 表現最強的是技術（64 分），最弱的是AI 就緒度（39 分）；最大的單一缺口是 Question Coverage & FAQ Presence，0/100（No FAQ schema markup detected）。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 500 個 Pharma / Biotech 類網站 中，這個分數排在前四分之一。

Audited URL: https://scivision.com.tw

48/100
Grade
C

Room for improvement. Focus on high-priority recommendations.

Updated today

Top 25% in Pharma / Biotech Median 38 · Top quartile 43 · across 500 audited sites in Pharma / Biotech

scivision.com.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎？

部分準備好：scivision.com.tw 的實測分數為 48/100（C 級）。 最該先做的兩件事是 Add FAQ Schema Markup、Make This Page’s Facts Extractable。

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 47
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 64
Authority Signals 25% of the score 46
AI Readiness 30% of the score 39

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts

    On https://scivision.com.tw · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  2. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +6 pts

    On https://scivision.com.tw · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 20/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://scivision.com.tw · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  4. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +5.1 pts

    On https://scivision.com.tw · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 0/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  5. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +4.8 pts

    On https://scivision.com.tw · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 63/100

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 13 of 96 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • Add canonical tag to prevent duplicate content issues
    • This page opens 32 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 81/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 704 words, 18 paragraphs, 22 lists, 16 images (16 with alt text)

    • Content length (704 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 13/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    4 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, Organization, Corporation, ImageObject

  • AI Readability Score Pass 95/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 8 words/sentence. 1 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 79/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 2, H3: 15. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Partial 56/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 1 of 16 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("size_1920x1200", "size_560x420").
    • 14 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 16 images but only ~704 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 80/100

    1% of the overall score

    4 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    16 render-blocking resources. 675 elements for 704 words

    • 16 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 60/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 63/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 13 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 13 of 96 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 33/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    8 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 66/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Contact, Social profiles (2)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 47/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    4 of 23 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 20/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 62/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 7/30/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 40 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 55/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 55/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    704 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Pharma / Biotech · Run a free AI Readiness audit

這是你經營的網站？ 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單 · 申請移除這張成績單

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai