Kuroma Kuroma

kadokawa.com.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 62/100

台灣角川 (kadokawa.com.tw) 是 Publishing / News Media 類網站；Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 62/100（A 級），檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 20 日。 表現最強的是技術（87 分），最弱的是權威性（47 分）；最大的單一缺口是 E-E-A-T Signals，13/100（No author attribution found）。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 850 個 Publishing / News Media 類網站 中，這個分數排在前四分之一。

Audited URL: https://kadokawa.com.tw

62/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in Publishing / News Media Median 40 · Top quartile 45 · across 850 audited sites in Publishing / News Media

kadokawa.com.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎？

大致準備好了：kadokawa.com.tw 的實測分數為 62/100（A 級）。 剩下要補的是 Add FAQ Schema Markup、Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals。

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 59
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 87
Authority Signals 25% of the score 47
AI Readiness 30% of the score 61

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6.1 pts

    On https://kadokawa.com.tw · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 13/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  2. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +5.6 pts

    On https://kadokawa.com.tw · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 22/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • 1 of your 30 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
  3. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +4.6 pts

    On https://kadokawa.com.tw · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 29/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  4. Add Trust Signals up to +4 pts

    On https://kadokawa.com.tw · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 56/100

    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Your Organization schema declares 3 of the identity properties engines read; add the rest (name, url, logo, sameAs, contactPoint, address)
    • Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)
    • Add customer testimonials or reviews
  5. Add External Citations & References up to +3.2 pts

    On https://kadokawa.com.tw · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 65/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 22327 words, 28 paragraphs, 154 lists, 662 images (630 with alt text)

    • 32 images missing alt text
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 29/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 45/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    2 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebSite, Organization

  • AI Readability Score Pass 80/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 77 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Needs work 32/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 0, H3: 24. Hierarchy issues.

    • Missing H1 heading
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Partial 56/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 32 of 662 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 9 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("OMORI (2)", "FLASHLIGHT 2", "FLASHLIGHT 2").
    • 660 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 662 images but only ~22327 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    2 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 90/100

    2% of the overall score

    4 render-blocking resources. 14630 elements for 22327 words

  • Mobile Optimization Pass 77/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 17 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 90/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 30 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 13/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 4/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 65/100

    9% of the overall score

    16 external links, 1 citation phrases, 490 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 56/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (3 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Social profiles (2)

    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 22/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    1 of 30 headings open a quotable passage, 1 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Pass 100/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 79/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/19/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 38/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    6 of 1021 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 44/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 44/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    22327 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Publishing / News Media · Run a free AI Readiness audit

這是你經營的網站？ 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單 · 申請移除這張成績單

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai