Kuroma Kuroma

globalsense.com.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 57/100

國際觀行銷｜台中B2B行銷公司｜AI SEO與AEO行銷 (globalsense.com.tw) 是 MarTech / Marketing Platform 類網站；Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 57/100（B 級），檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 20 日。 表現最強的是技術（81 分），最弱的是AI 就緒度（36 分）；最大的單一缺口是 Citation-Worthiness，0/100（Limited use of specific statistics）。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 253 個 MarTech 類網站 中，這個分數高於中位數。

Audited URL: https://globalsense.com.tw

57/100
Grade
B

Good foundation. Implementing recommendations could significantly boost visibility.

Updated today

Above the median in MarTech Median 53 · Top quartile 58 · across 253 audited sites in MarTech

globalsense.com.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎？

大致可以，仍有缺口：globalsense.com.tw 的實測分數為 57/100（B 級）。 要補的缺口是 Make This Page’s Facts Extractable、Increase Citation-Worthy Content。

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 73
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 81
Authority Signals 25% of the score 46
AI Readiness 30% of the score 36

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://globalsense.com.tw · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://globalsense.com.tw · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  3. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +5.1 pts

    On https://globalsense.com.tw · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 0/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  4. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.6 pts

    On https://globalsense.com.tw · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 35/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +4.1 pts

    On https://globalsense.com.tw · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 9/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2058 words, 68 paragraphs, 13 lists, 135 images (128 with alt text)

    • 7 images missing alt text (e.g. …
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Pass 91/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ schema present. 3 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

  • Structured Data Quality Fail 9/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    4 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Organization, WebSite, ProfessionalService, WebPage, BreadcrumbList, FAQPage

  • AI Readability Score Partial 64/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 12 words/sentence. 19 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 100/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 2, H3: 7. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 39/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 7 of 135 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 62 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("Airfom", "皇田工業", "Botech Logo").
    • 25 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 135 images but only ~2058 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    4 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 60/100

    2% of the overall score

    33 render-blocking resources. 1633 elements for 2058 words

    • 33 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 68/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 87/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 9 placeholder links

    • 9 of 92 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 35/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    7 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 66/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (8 identity properties), Contact, Testimonials, Social profiles (4)

    • No privacy policy link found

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 43/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    2 of 18 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema

  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Pass 85/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 7/22/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 88 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 44/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 44/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2058 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for MarTech / Marketing Platform · Run a free AI Readiness audit

這是你經營的網站？ 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單 · 申請移除這張成績單

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai