rakuten.com.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 54/100
樂天市場購物網- Rakuten日本最大線上購物網站 (rakuten.com.tw) 是 Marketplace 類網站;Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 54/100(B 級),檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 20 日。 表現最強的是技術(69 分),最弱的是AI 就緒度(44 分);最大的單一缺口是 Question Coverage & FAQ Presence,0/100(No FAQ schema markup detected)。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 177 個 Marketplace 類網站 中,這個分數排在前四分之一。
Audited URL: https://rakuten.com.tw
Good foundation. Implementing recommendations could significantly boost visibility.
Updated todayTop 25% in Marketplace Median 37 · Top quartile 42 · across 177 audited sites in Marketplace
rakuten.com.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎?
大致可以,仍有缺口:rakuten.com.tw 的實測分數為 54/100(B 級)。 要補的缺口是 Add FAQ Schema Markup、Update Content Freshness。
Category scores
Top fixes, ranked by points recovered
Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.
-
Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +6.5 pts
On https://rakuten.com.tw · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 0/100
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
- Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
- Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
- Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
-
Update Content Freshness up to +5.7 pts
On https://rakuten.com.tw · AI Readiness → Content Freshness, scored 0/100
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
- Update statistics and data to 2026
- Add article:modified_time meta tag
- Include "Last updated: [date]" visibly on page
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +5.2 pts
On https://rakuten.com.tw · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 26/100
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
-
Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +4.5 pts
On https://rakuten.com.tw · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 38/100
- No FAQ structure detected
- 3 of your 56 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
- Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
- Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
-
Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts
On https://rakuten.com.tw · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Add a references or sources section
All 19 scored checks
Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.
On-Page Content 25% of the score
-
Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 100/100
6.5% of the overall score
Found: 5729 words, 98 paragraphs, 179 lists, 303 images (298 with alt text)
- 5 images missing alt text (e.g. , , (inline image))
-
Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100
6.5% of the overall score
No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
Structured Data Quality Needs work 45/100
4.5% of the overall score
5 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: SaleEvent
-
AI Readability Score Pass 91/100
3% of the overall score
Average 7 words/sentence. 12 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
Heading Hierarchy Partial 73/100
2.8% of the overall score
H1: 0, H2: 6, H3: 27. Hierarchy issues.
- Missing H1 heading
- Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
-
Media Accessibility Partial 50/100
1.8% of the overall score
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 5 of 303 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
- 25 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("rakuten-logo", "反詐騙", "Monkeys").
- 238 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- This page has 303 images but only ~5729 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
Technical Optimization 20% of the score
-
Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100
1% of the overall score
5 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
Page Performance Indicators Needs work 35/100
2% of the overall score
Fetch succeeded but was slow (19513ms). 23 render-blocking resources. 5624 elements for 5729 words
- Server response was slow (19513ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
- 23 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
-
Mobile Optimization Partial 57/100
4% of the overall score
Has viewport
-
Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 75/100
13% of the overall score
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 59 placeholder links
- Canonical URL does not match page URL
- 59 of 1869 links cannot be followed by a crawler
Authority Signals 25% of the score
-
E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 26/100
7% of the overall score
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 10/25. Authority: 8/25. Trust: 0/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
External Citations & References Partial 55/100
9% of the overall score
19 external links, 0 citation phrases, 41 statistics. No references section.
-
Trust & Brand Signals Partial 67/100
9% of the overall score
Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Social profiles (3)
- No contact information easily accessible
AI Readiness 30% of the score
-
Answer Box Potential Needs work 38/100
7.2% of the overall score
3 of 56 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures
- No FAQ structure detected
-
Citation-Worthiness Pass 80/100
7.5% of the overall score
0 original data indicators, 20 percentages, 0 quotes.
-
Content Freshness Fail 0/100
5.7% of the overall score
No recent year references
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
Unique Value Proposition Fail 23/100
5.1% of the overall score
10 of 380 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.
-
AI Discoverability Not measured 62/100
3% of the overall score
Score: 62/100
-
Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100
1.5% of the overall score
5729 words readable without JavaScript
This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works
檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站?認領這張成績單How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Marketplace · Run a free AI Readiness audit
這是你經營的網站? 這是你的網站?認領這張成績單 · 申請移除這張成績單