Kuroma Kuroma

myship.7-11.com.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 16/100

7-ELEVEN 交貨便 (myship.7-11.com.tw) 是 Marketplace 類網站；Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 16/100（F 級），檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 19 日。 表現最強的是技術（37 分），最弱的是權威性（0 分）；最大的單一缺口是 Question Coverage & FAQ Presence，0/100（No FAQ schema markup detected）。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 177 個 Marketplace 類網站 中，這個分數低於中位數。

Audited URL: https://myship.7-11.com.tw

16/100
Grade
F

Significant improvements needed. Start with critical recommendations.

Updated 1 day ago

Below the median in Marketplace Median 37 · Top quartile 42 · across 177 audited sites in Marketplace

myship.7-11.com.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎？

還沒有：myship.7-11.com.tw 的實測分數為 16/100（F 級）。 先從這裡開始： Add FAQ Schema Markup、Make This Page’s Facts Extractable。

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 21
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 37
Authority Signals 25% of the score 0
AI Readiness 30% of the score 10

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access up to +10.5 pts

    On https://myship.7-11.com.tw · Technical Optimization → Crawlability & Accessibility, scored 19/100

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 1 of 3 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at myship.7-11.com.tw is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
    • Add canonical tag to prevent duplicate content issues
    • This page opens 2 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
    • Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +9 pts

    On https://myship.7-11.com.tw · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 0/100

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
    • Add links to reputable sources that support your claims
    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  3. Add Trust Signals up to +9 pts

    On https://myship.7-11.com.tw · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 0/100

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
    • Link to an about page that says who publishes this site
    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
  4. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://myship.7-11.com.tw · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  5. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +7.2 pts

    On https://myship.7-11.com.tw · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 0/100

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
    • Add a section heading followed by 25 to 200 words that answer it on their own, so an assistant can lift the answer without the rest of the page
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Partial 50/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 1000 words, 2 paragraphs, 2 lists, 2 images (0 with alt text)

    • 2 images missing alt text (e.g. /Images/MyShip/seven_logo.png, /Images/MyShip/logo_white.png)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Fail 0/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 9/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Needs work 43/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 31 words/sentence. 16 long sentences. Has text formatting.

    • Average sentence length (31 words) is too long for easy AI parsing
    • 16 sentences exceed 25 words
  • Heading Hierarchy Fail 0/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 0, H3: 0. Hierarchy issues.

    • No headings a reader can see
  • Media Accessibility Fail 23/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 2 of 2 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 40/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Pass 90/100

    2% of the overall score

    3 render-blocking resources. 78 elements for 1000 words

  • Mobile Optimization Partial 68/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Fail 19/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Missing canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 1 placeholder links

    • Missing canonical tag
    • 1 of 3 links cannot be followed by a crawler
    • The response at myship.7-11.com.tw is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 0/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Fail 0/100

    9% of the overall score

    0 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

    • Few external citations to authoritative sources
  • Trust & Brand Signals Fail 0/100

    9% of the overall score

    No trust signals found

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No about or company page linked from this page
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Fail 0/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    0 of 0 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No passage an assistant could quote whole
    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Fail 0/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    No recent year references

    • No recent year references in content
    • No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 5/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 20 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 1 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 43/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 43/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    1000 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Marketplace · Run a free AI Readiness audit

這是你經營的網站？ 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單 · 申請移除這張成績單

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai