archwiz.net 的 AI Readiness 實測 39/100
ARCHWIZ 建巫資訊 (archwiz.net) 是 科技 類網站;Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 39/100(D 級),檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 10 日。 表現最強的是技術(62 分),最弱的是權威性(22 分);最大的單一缺口是結構化資料品質,0/100(No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the one list or table this check found sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar)。
檢測網址: https://archwiz.net
這次檢測距今已 37 天。AI 的回答會隨時間改變,現在 AI 搜尋看到的情況可能和這張成績單不同。
archwiz.net 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎?
還沒有:archwiz.net 的實測分數為 39/100(D 級)。 先從這裡開始: Make This Page’s Facts Extractable、Expand Content Depth & Comprehensiveness。
類別分數
本次檢測採用的評分標準版本是 2026-08-10,而不是目前的 2026-08-13 版。分數只能在同一代評分標準內比較,因此本頁不列出各項檢查占總分的比例。本頁的檢查項目、判定與分數,都是那次檢測實際量到的結果。重新檢測這個網站,就會依目前的評分標準計分。
全部 19 項評分檢查
公開評分標準的每一項檢查,以及本次檢測在頁面上實際看到的內容。
頁面內容
-
Found: 216 words, 11 paragraphs, 2 lists, 3 images (3 with alt text)
- Content length (216 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
-
FAQ schema present. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
-
3 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: EducationalOrganization, Person, Course, WebPage, FAQPage, WebSite, Organization, AboutPage
- No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the one list or table this check found sits in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
-
Average 5 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. Has text formatting.
-
H1: 1, H2: 5, H3: 4. Hierarchy issues.
- Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
-
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 2 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("Logo", "Logo") that tells AI nothing about the content.
- 1 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
技術
-
3 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
6 render-blocking resources. 253 elements for 216 words
-
Has viewport
-
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 11 placeholder links
- 11 of 23 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- Training-data crawlers blocked by policy choice: ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended, Meta-ExternalAgent, Amazonbot, CCBot, Bytespider. This is a content-licensing decision with no AI search visibility cost, so it is not scored.
權威性
-
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/10. Trust: 0/25
- No author attribution found
- No publication or update dates found
-
4 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.
-
Present: SSL, Privacy Policy, Contact
AI 就緒度
-
0 definitions, 0 ordered lists, 0 comparison structures, FAQ schema
-
0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
No recent year references
- No recent year references in content
- No machine-readable date on the page, so AI cannot tell when it was written
-
1 of 17 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
-
Score: 78/100
-
216 words readable without JavaScript
本次檢測衡量的是引用就緒度:AI 引擎能多容易地爬取、擷取並引述這些頁面。它無法看見站外品牌足跡(提及、評論、第三方報導),而這些足跡決定了 AI 引擎是否會檢索某個品牌;Kuroma 的能見度掃描與站外訊號負責追蹤那一面。 評分方式說明
檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站?認領這張成績單其他 科技 類網站的成績單
- Software Development Company (pharosproduction.com) · 88/100
- Neo Genesis (NeoGenesis) (neogenesis.app) · 75/100
- GetWidget (getwidget.dev) · 74/100
- PURIST (purist.online) · 74/100
- Hire Flutter Developers (hireflutterdev.com) · 72/100
- Hire Senior Python & AI Engineers (uvik.net) · 72/100
其他還沒有公開成績單的 科技 類網站
這些網站目前還沒有公開的 AI Readiness 成績單。選一個就能免費檢測;要在下一頁按下確認才會開始。