www.unilever.com.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 44/100
聯合利華台灣 (www.unilever.com.tw) 是 科技 類網站;Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 44/100(C 級),檢測日期 2026 年 9 月 14 日。 表現最強的是技術(57 分),最弱的是AI 就緒度(34 分);最大的單一缺口是問題涵蓋度與 FAQ 存在與否,0/100(No FAQ schema markup detected)。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 3,299 個 科技 類網站 中,這個分數低於中位數。
檢測網址: https://www.unilever.com.tw
能挽回最多分數的檢查項目是可爬取性與可存取性:這項占總分 13%,只拿到 41/100,讓總分少了 7.7 分。
在 科技 類別中低於中位數 中位數 46 · 前四分之一門檻 53 · 樣本為 3,299 個受測網站(科技 類別)
www.unilever.com.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎?
部分準備好:www.unilever.com.tw 的實測分數為 44/100(C 級)。 最該先做的兩件事是 Add FAQ Schema Markup、Make This Page’s Facts Extractable。
類別分數
優先修正項目(依可挽回的分數排序)
排序依據是各項檢查的占分乘以落差,因此排最前面的是收益最大的修正,不一定是分數最低的檢查。
-
Improve Crawlability & AI Crawler Access 最多可 +7.7 分
位於 https://www.unilever.com.tw · 技術 → 可爬取性與可存取性, 得分 41/100
- 10 of 45 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- The response at www.unilever.com.tw is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
- This page opens 13 distinct paths into the rest of the site; linking to more of it gives crawlers more to find
- Replace placeholder links (href="#", javascript:) with real URLs or remove them
- Serve a plain-text robots.txt at www.unilever.com.tw — the response we received could not be parsed as one
-
Increase Citation-Worthy Content 最多可 +7.5 分
位於 https://www.unilever.com.tw · AI 就緒度 → 值得被引用度, 得分 0/100
- Limited use of specific statistics
- Conduct original research or surveys
- Include specific statistics with sources
- Add expert quotes and interviews
-
Add FAQ Schema Markup 最多可 +6.5 分
位於 https://www.unilever.com.tw · 頁面內容 → 問題涵蓋度與 FAQ 存在與否, 得分 0/100
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
- Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
- Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
- Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
-
Add External Citations & References 最多可 +5.9 分
位於 https://www.unilever.com.tw · 權威性 → 外部引用與參考來源, 得分 35/100
- Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
- Add a references or sources section
- Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
-
Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals 最多可 +5.6 分
位於 https://www.unilever.com.tw · 權威性 → E-E-A-T 訊號, 得分 20/100
- No author attribution found
- Add author byline with name and credentials
- Create detailed author bio pages
- Include "About Us" with company history
全部 19 項評分檢查
公開評分標準的每一項檢查,以及本次檢測在頁面上實際看到的內容。
頁面內容 占總分 25%
-
占總分 6.5%
Found: 483 words, 19 paragraphs, 6 lists, 15 images (13 with alt text)
- Content length (483 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
- 2 images missing alt text (e.g. /content-images/92ui5egz/production/ac7e662fc5e9ae03a4bc1f678be22eb1251cbe0e-1920x1080.jpg?rect=0,3,1920,1075&w=150&h=84&fit=crop&auto=format, /core-assets/logos/logo-static-white.svg)
-
占總分 6.5%
No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content
- No FAQ schema markup detected
- Few question-based headings
-
占總分 4.5%
1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: WebPage, Organization, WebSite
-
占總分 3%
Average 10 words/sentence. 0 long sentences. No text formatting.
-
占總分 2.8%
H1: 1, H2: 11, H3: 0. Proper hierarchy.
-
占總分 1.8%
Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.
- 1 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("AdChoices").
- 11 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
- This page has 13 images but only ~483 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.
技術 占總分 20%
-
占總分 1%
1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph
-
占總分 2%
6 render-blocking resources. 572 elements for 483 words
-
占總分 4%
Has viewport. 12 responsive images. has theme-color
-
占總分 13%
HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. AI crawler access unverified (robots.txt unreadable). 10 placeholder links
- 10 of 45 links cannot be followed by a crawler
- The response at www.unilever.com.tw is not a robots.txt file, so AI crawler access could not be verified.
權威性 占總分 25%
-
占總分 7%
Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 4/25. Trust: 14/25
- No author attribution found
-
占總分 9%
16 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.
-
占總分 9%
Present: About page, Publisher schema (2 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (4)
AI 就緒度 占總分 30%
-
占總分 7.2%
2 of 12 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures
- No FAQ structure detected
-
占總分 7.5%
0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.
- Limited use of specific statistics
-
占總分 5.7%
References current year. Last modified: 9/14/2026
-
占總分 5.1%
0 of 41 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.
- No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
-
占總分 3%
Score: 84/100
-
占總分 1.5%
This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none
- This page could only be read with a full browser; AI crawlers use none, so they receive far less of it than a visitor does.
本次檢測衡量的是引用就緒度:AI 引擎能多容易地爬取、擷取並引述這些頁面。它無法看見站外品牌足跡(提及、評論、第三方報導),而這些足跡決定了 AI 引擎是否會檢索某個品牌;Kuroma 的能見度掃描與站外訊號負責追蹤那一面。 評分方式說明
檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站?認領這張成績單其他 科技 類網站的成績單
- Software Development Company (pharosproduction.com) · 88/100
- Neo Genesis (NeoGenesis) (neogenesis.app) · 75/100
- GetWidget (getwidget.dev) · 74/100
- PURIST (purist.online) · 74/100
- Hire Flutter Developers (hireflutterdev.com) · 72/100
- Hire Senior Python & AI Engineers (uvik.net) · 72/100
其他還沒有公開成績單的 科技 類網站
這些網站目前還沒有公開的 AI Readiness 成績單。選一個就能免費檢測;要在下一頁按下確認才會開始。