Kuroma Kuroma

kabu.com scores 63/100 for AI Readiness

三菱UFJ eスマート証券（旧社名：auカブコム証券） (kabu.com) is a Wealth Management / Investment site; Kuroma measured its AI Readiness at 63/100 (grade A), audited 20 Aug 2026. Its strongest area is Technical Optimization (88) and its weakest is Authority Signals (48); the biggest single gap is E-E-A-T Signals at 13/100 (No author attribution found). That places it in the top quartile of the 177 Wealth Management / Investment sites Kuroma has audited.

Audited URL: https://kabu.com

63/100
Grade
A

Great job! Your page is well-optimized with minor improvements possible.

Updated today

Top 25% in Wealth Management / Investment Median 38 · Top quartile 45 · across 177 audited sites in Wealth Management / Investment

Is kabu.com ready for AI search?

Largely yes: kabu.com scores 63/100 (grade A). The remaining fixes are Make This Page’s Facts Extractable and Add FAQ Schema Markup.

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 53
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 88
Authority Signals 25% of the score 48
AI Readiness 30% of the score 66

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +6.1 pts

    On https://kabu.com · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 13/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  2. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +4.3 pts

    On https://kabu.com · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 34/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +4.1 pts

    On https://kabu.com · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 55/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
  4. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +3.9 pts

    On https://kabu.com · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 46/100

    • 4 of your 75 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses
  5. Make This Page’s Facts Extractable up to +3.4 pts

    On https://kabu.com · On-Page Content → Structured Data Quality, scored 25/100

    • Turn any comparison or specification into a table with a header row — tables are the most extractable structure on a page

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 90/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 2244 words, 74 paragraphs, 33 lists, 151 images (96 with alt text)

    • 55 images missing alt text (e.g. /2024renew_assets/imgs/common/icon_form_search.svg, /2024renew_assets/imgs/common/header/icon_guide.png, /2024renew_assets/imgs/common/header/icon_layer_beginner.png)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 34/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    FAQ section found (no schema). 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Needs work 25/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage, WebSite

  • AI Readability Score Pass 80/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 7 words/sentence. 3 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Needs work 34/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 0, H2: 12, H3: 2. Hierarchy issues.

    • Missing H1 heading
    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 44/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 53 of 149 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 12 images have generic or filename-only alt text ("画像", "画像", "画像") that tells AI nothing about the content.
    • 8 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("No.1", "ツール・アプリ", "投資信託").
    • 90 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 100/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 68/100

    2% of the overall score

    11 render-blocking resources. 1572 elements for 2244 words

    • 11 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 59 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 94/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 11 placeholder links

    • 11 of 323 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 13/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Partial 55/100

    9% of the overall score

    36 external links, 0 citation phrases, 5 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 69/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (4)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 46/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    4 of 75 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

  • Citation-Worthiness Pass 80/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 3 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 78/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/17/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 47/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    9 of 191 passages carry a figure, 2 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 76/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 76/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    2244 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

Score your own site → Claim this card

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Wealth Management / Investment · Run a free AI Readiness audit

Run this site? Claim this card · Ask us to remove this card

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai