Kuroma Kuroma

newwave.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 51/100

提供企業數位轉型所需的一切｜客戶服務｜智慧製造｜企業雲端通訊 NewWave鑫潮國際股份有限公司 (newwave.tw) 是 Data & Analytics 類網站；Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 51/100（B 級），檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 20 日。 表現最強的是技術（78 分），最弱的是AI 就緒度（39 分）；最大的單一缺口是 Structured Data Quality，0/100（No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 15 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar）。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 152 個 Data & Analytics 類網站 中，這個分數高於中位數。

Audited URL: https://newwave.tw

51/100
Grade
B

Good foundation. Implementing recommendations could significantly boost visibility.

Updated today

Above the median in Data & Analytics Median 48.5 · Top quartile 54 · across 152 audited sites in Data & Analytics

newwave.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎？

大致可以，仍有缺口：newwave.tw 的實測分數為 51/100（B 級）。 要補的缺口是 Make This Page’s Facts Extractable、Add FAQ Schema Markup。

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 48
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 78
Authority Signals 25% of the score 47
AI Readiness 30% of the score 39

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Increase Citation-Worthy Content up to +7.5 pts

    On https://newwave.tw · AI Readiness → Citation-Worthiness, scored 0/100

    • Limited use of specific statistics
    • Conduct original research or surveys
    • Include specific statistics with sources
    • Add expert quotes and interviews
  2. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://newwave.tw · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  3. Improve Unique Value Proposition up to +5.1 pts

    On https://newwave.tw · AI Readiness → Unique Value Proposition, scored 0/100

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
    • Put a measured number in the sentences that describe what you do: a price, a percentage, a latency, a volume
    • Set a figure against something in the same sentence: a before and after, your price against the list price, your number against the alternative
    • Widen the evidence: prices, percentages, measured magnitudes and volumes each answer a different question about the same claim
  4. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +4.6 pts

    On https://newwave.tw · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 29/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  5. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +4.6 pts

    On https://newwave.tw · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 35/100

    • No author attribution found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 75/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 937 words, 18 paragraphs, 20 lists, 33 images (18 with alt text)

    • Content length (937 words) is below recommended minimum of 1,000 words
    • 15 images missing alt text (e.g. , , …
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 29/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 1 question headings. 1 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 0/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    1 JSON-LD scripts. Schema types: Corporation, Organization, WebSite, ImageObject, WebPage, Person, Article

    • No extractable data structures in the page's own content — the 15 lists and tables this check found all sit in the navigation, header, footer or sidebar
  • AI Readability Score Partial 69/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 12 words/sentence. 6 long sentences. No text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 95/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 3, H3: 3. Hierarchy issues.

    • Heading levels are skipped (H1 straight to H3)
  • Media Accessibility Needs work 38/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 15 of 33 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 14 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("mulesoft banner-01", "voicecloud-20", "aps-02").
    • 29 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 33 images but only ~937 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Pass 90/100

    1% of the overall score

    1 valid schemas, has Organization, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 65/100

    2% of the overall score

    Fetch succeeded but was slow (4953ms). 3 render-blocking resources. 911 elements for 937 words

    • Server response was slow (4953ms; threshold 3000ms), which risks crawler fetch timeouts
  • Mobile Optimization Pass 75/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. has theme-color

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Pass 80/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 10 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 10 of 115 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Needs work 35/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 12/25. Trust: 10/25

    • No author attribution found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    9 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Partial 69/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page, Publisher schema (4 identity properties), Privacy Policy, Legal notice, Contact, Social profiles (3)

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Partial 51/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    8 of 16 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 0 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Fail 0/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

    • Limited use of specific statistics
  • Content Freshness Partial 73/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References last year. Last modified: 7/22/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Fail 0/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    0 of 78 passages carry a figure, 0 set two figures against each other, 0 named versions or models.

    • No passage on the page carries a figure a reader could check
  • AI Discoverability Not measured 78/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 78/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    937 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Data & Analytics · Run a free AI Readiness audit

這是你經營的網站？ 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單 · 申請移除這張成績單

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai