Kuroma Kuroma

skm.com.tw 的 AI Readiness 實測 50/100

新光三越 (skm.com.tw) 是 Marketplace 類網站；Kuroma 實測其 AI Readiness 為 50/100（B 級），檢測日期 2026 年 8 月 20 日。 表現最強的是技術（69 分），最弱的是權威性（17 分）；最大的單一缺口是 E-E-A-T Signals，0/100（No author attribution found）。 在 Kuroma 檢測過的 177 個 Marketplace 類網站 中，這個分數排在前四分之一。

Audited URL: https://skm.com.tw

50/100
Grade
B

Good foundation. Implementing recommendations could significantly boost visibility.

Updated today

Top 25% in Marketplace Median 37 · Top quartile 42 · across 177 audited sites in Marketplace

skm.com.tw 準備好被 AI 搜尋引用了嗎？

大致可以，仍有缺口：skm.com.tw 的實測分數為 50/100（B 級）。 要補的缺口是 Make This Page’s Facts Extractable、Add FAQ Schema Markup。

Category scores

On-Page Content 25% of the score 56
Technical Optimization 20% of the score 69
Authority Signals 25% of the score 17
AI Readiness 30% of the score 61

Top fixes, ranked by points recovered

Ranked by each check's share of the overall score times how far it fell short, so the biggest number is the biggest win, not the lowest score.

  1. Add Trust Signals up to +7.9 pts

    On https://www.skm.com.tw/ · Authority Signals → Trust & Brand Signals, scored 12/100

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible
    • Add a privacy policy page and link to it in the footer
    • Declare the publisher in Organization schema (name, url, logo, sameAs) so an engine can attribute the page
    • Add clear contact options (form, email, phone)
  2. Strengthen E-E-A-T Signals up to +7 pts

    On https://www.skm.com.tw/ · Authority Signals → E-E-A-T Signals, scored 0/100

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
    • Add author byline with name and credentials
    • Create detailed author bio pages
    • Include "About Us" with company history
  3. Add External Citations & References up to +5.9 pts

    On https://www.skm.com.tw/ · Authority Signals → External Citations & References, scored 35/100

    • Use citation language like "according to..." or "research shows..."
    • Add a references or sources section
    • Include specific statistics and data points - AI loves citing numbers
  4. Add FAQ Schema Markup up to +4.7 pts

    On https://www.skm.com.tw/ · On-Page Content → Question Coverage & FAQ Presence, scored 28/100

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
    • Identify the top 5-10 questions your audience asks
    • Create a dedicated FAQ section on this page
    • Add FAQPage schema markup (see code below)
  5. Optimize for Featured Snippets & AI Answers up to +4.4 pts

    On https://www.skm.com.tw/ · AI Readiness → Answer Box Potential, scored 39/100

    • No FAQ structure detected
    • 2 of your 17 headings open a passage an assistant could quote; the rest introduce a link or a label
    • Add clear definitions that directly answer "What is X?" questions
    • Add comparison tables, definition lists or step-by-step markup - structured comparisons frequently appear in AI responses

All 19 scored checks

Every check the published rubric scores, with what this audit found on the page.

On-Page Content 25% of the score

  • Content Depth & Comprehensiveness Pass 88/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    Found: 4588 words, 1 paragraphs, 194 lists, 2 tables, 286 images (193 with alt text)

    • 93 images missing alt text (e.g. (inline image), img.skmonline.com.tw, skm-pro-bucket.s3.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com)
  • Question Coverage & FAQ Presence Needs work 28/100

    6.5% of the overall score

    No FAQ structure. 0 question headings. 0 questions detected in content

    • No FAQ schema markup detected
    • Few question-based headings
  • Structured Data Quality Fail 16/100

    4.5% of the overall score

    No JSON-LD structured data found

  • AI Readability Score Pass 80/100

    3% of the overall score

    Average 8 words/sentence. 11 long sentences. Has text formatting.

  • Heading Hierarchy Pass 96/100

    2.8% of the overall score

    H1: 1, H2: 7, H3: 9. Proper hierarchy.

  • Media Accessibility Needs work 44/100

    1.8% of the overall score

    Measures whether images, video, and charts have text equivalents AI can read.

    • 93 of 286 content images have no alt text, so their content is invisible to AI search.
    • 2 images have alt text too short to describe what they show ("DIAMOND TOWERS", "SKMMedia").
    • 256 images have no caption, so AI can't read the takeaway of a chart or diagram without one.
    • This page has 286 images but only ~4588 words, so your key information may be trapped in images that AI search can't read.

Technical Optimization 20% of the score

  • Schema Markup Completeness Needs work 40/100

    1% of the overall score

    0 valid schemas, has OpenGraph

  • Page Performance Indicators Partial 60/100

    2% of the overall score

    51 render-blocking resources. 3717 elements for 4588 words

    • 51 render-blocking scripts and stylesheets load before this page can appear
  • Mobile Optimization Partial 70/100

    4% of the overall score

    Has viewport. 4 responsive images

  • Crawlability & Accessibility Partial 73/100

    13% of the overall score

    HTTPS enabled. Has canonical. Indexable. All scored AI crawlers allowed. 117 placeholder links

    • Canonical URL does not match page URL
    • 117 of 275 links cannot be followed by a crawler

Authority Signals 25% of the score

  • E-E-A-T Signals Fail 0/100

    7% of the overall score

    Experience: 0/10. Expertise: 0/25. Authority: 0/25. Trust: 0/25

    • No author attribution found
    • No publication or update dates found
  • External Citations & References Needs work 35/100

    9% of the overall score

    10 external links, 0 citation phrases, 0 statistics. No references section.

  • Trust & Brand Signals Fail 12/100

    9% of the overall score

    Present: About page

    • No privacy policy link found
    • No contact information easily accessible

AI Readiness 30% of the score

  • Answer Box Potential Needs work 39/100

    7.2% of the overall score

    2 of 17 headings open a quotable passage, 0 definitions, 2 comparison structures

    • No FAQ structure detected
  • Citation-Worthiness Pass 80/100

    7.5% of the overall score

    0 original data indicators, 0 percentages, 0 quotes.

  • Content Freshness Pass 79/100

    5.7% of the overall score

    References current year. Last modified: 8/20/2026

  • Unique Value Proposition Needs work 42/100

    5.1% of the overall score

    8 of 261 passages carry a figure, 1 set two figures against each other, 9 named versions or models.

  • AI Discoverability Not measured 46/100

    3% of the overall score

    Score: 46/100

  • Raw HTML Availability Pass 100/100

    1.5% of the overall score

    4588 words readable without JavaScript

This audit measures citation readiness: how easily AI engines can crawl, extract, and quote these pages. It cannot see the off-site brand footprint (mentions, reviews, third-party coverage) that gates whether AI engines retrieve a brand at all; Kuroma's visibility scans and off-site signals track that side. How the score works

檢測你自己的網站 → 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單

How Kuroma scores AI Readiness · Every published AI Readiness score card · AI Readiness benchmark for Marketplace · Run a free AI Readiness audit

這是你經營的網站？ 這是你的網站？認領這張成績單 · 申請移除這張成績單

AI Readiness across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity & Google AI · kuroma.ai